Challenges and Emerging Solutions in the Spectroscopic Characterization of Rocky Exoplanet Atmospheres: A Review

Author: Kripita Srivastava, Delhi Public School, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

The spectroscopic characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres has become an important area of astrophysical research because it provides valuable information about the composition, evolution, and potential habitability of planets beyond the Solar System. Recent advances in high-resolution spectroscopy and the James Webb Space Telescope have significantly improved the quality of atmospheric observations. However, the characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres remains challenging because their atmospheric signals are often weak and difficult to interpret. These challenges are further complicated by uncertainties in atmospheric retrieval, the presence of clouds and hazes, incomplete molecular line databases, and instrumental limitations. This review examines the current methods used to characterize rocky exoplanet atmospheres and synthesizes recent findings on the major challenges and the solutions proposed in the literature. Particular emphasis is placed on the relationship between weak atmospheric signals and atmospheric retrieval, while also discussing advances in observational techniques, atmospheric modelling, molecular databases, and machine learning. By bringing together these developments, this review provides an integrated perspective on the current state of the field and highlights the approaches that are most likely to improve the reliability of future spectroscopic studies of rocky exoplanet atmospheres.

Keywords: Rocky exoplanets, Exoplanet atmospheres, Spectroscopy, Atmospheric retrieval, High-resolution spectroscopy

Introduction

The discovery of exoplanets has transformed modern astrophysics by revealing that planetary systems are common throughout the universe. While thousands of exoplanets have now been identified, understanding their atmospheres remains one of the most important steps toward uncovering their physical properties, formation histories, and potential habitability (Madhusudhan, 2019; Wordsworth & Kreidberg, 2022). Spectroscopy has become the primary technique for investigating exoplanet atmospheres, enabling the detection of atmospheric molecules and the estimation of their chemical composition, temperature structure, and other key atmospheric properties (Madhusudhan, 2019; Snellen, 2025; Madhusudhan et al., 2016). In recent years, advances in observational facilities, including the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and High-Resolution Spectroscopy (HRS), have significantly improved the quality of atmospheric observations and expanded the possibilities for atmospheric characterization (Snellen, 2025; Yurchenko et al., 2025; Rukdee, 2024; Holmberg & Madhusudhan, 2023). Despite these advances, the spectroscopic characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres continues to face significant challenges. Their atmospheric signals are often extremely weak, making them difficult to distinguish from instrumental noise and other sources of contamination. These observational limitations, together with uncertainties in atmospheric retrieval, cloud and haze interference, incomplete molecular line databases, and instrumental constraints, continue to limit the reliability of atmospheric characterization (Wordsworth & Kreidberg, 2022; Yurchenko et al., 2025; Madhusudhan, 2025; Marley et al., 2013; Tennyson & Yurchenko, 2012).

This review synthesizes recent advances in the spectroscopic characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres by critically examining findings from the current literature. It first introduces the fundamental principles of atmospheric spectroscopy and the observational techniques used to investigate exoplanet atmospheres. The review then discusses the principal challenges affecting atmospheric characterization, with particular emphasis on weak atmospheric signals and atmospheric retrieval, while also examining the influence of clouds and hazes, molecular databases, and instrumental limitations (Wordsworth & Kreidberg, 2022; Madhusudhan, 2025; Marley et al., 2013; Tennyson & Yurchenko, 2012). Finally, it evaluates the solutions proposed in recent studies, including improved retrieval methods, advances in spectroscopic instrumentation, enhanced molecular databases, and emerging computational approaches such as Machine Learning (ML) (Yurchenko et al., 2025; Rukdee, 2024; Tennyson & Yurchenko, 2012; Nixon & Madhusudhan, 2020).

Methods

This review adopts a narrative literature synthesis approach rather than a systematic quantitative meta-analysis. Peer-reviewed sources published between 2012 and 2025 were drawn primarily from journals dedicated to planetary science and astrophysics, including the Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nature Reviews Physics, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Scientific Reports, and Space Science Reviews, together with relevant preprints archived on arXiv. Twelve sources meeting these criteria were selected on the basis of their direct relevance to the spectroscopic characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres.

The selected literature was organized thematically around three areas: (i) the fundamental observational techniques used to probe exoplanet atmospheres, namely transmission, emission, and reflection spectroscopy; (ii) the principal challenges limiting reliable atmospheric characterization, with particular attention to weak atmospheric signals, atmospheric retrieval uncertainty, cloud and haze interference, incomplete molecular line databases, and instrumental limitations; and (iii) the emerging observational and computational solutions proposed to address these challenges, including High-Resolution Spectroscopy, next-generation observatories, expanded molecular databases, advanced retrieval algorithms, Machine Learning, and multi-wavelength observational strategies. Findings across these sources were compared and synthesized to identify recurring themes, points of consensus, and open questions, with particular emphasis placed on the relationship between weak atmospheric signals and atmospheric retrieval, since the reviewed literature repeatedly identifies this relationship as the central bottleneck in the field.

Results

Fundamentals of Spectroscopic Characterization of Exoplanet Atmospheres

Spectroscopy is the primary technique used to investigate exoplanet atmospheres because it enables the detection of atmospheric molecules through their unique absorption and emission signatures. By analysing these spectral features, researchers can infer atmospheric composition, temperature structure, and other physical properties without directly observing the planet's surface (Madhusudhan, 2019; Wordsworth & Kreidberg, 2022; Snellen, 2025). The three main approaches include transmission spectroscopy, which analyses starlight passing through a planet's atmosphere during transit; emission spectroscopy, which studies radiation emitted by the planet; and reflection spectroscopy, which examines starlight reflected from the planetary atmosphere (Madhusudhan, 2019; Madhusudhan et al., 2016; Yurchenko et al., 2025). Together, these complementary techniques provide valuable insights into atmospheric composition and structure.

Despite significant progress, the spectroscopic characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres remains much more challenging than that of gas giants. Their smaller sizes and thinner atmospheres produce weaker spectral signatures, leading to lower signal-to-noise ratios and greater uncertainty in atmospheric retrieval (Wordsworth & Kreidberg, 2022; Yurchenko et al., 2025; Rukdee, 2024). Additional challenges, including cloud and haze interference, incomplete molecular line databases, and instrumental limitations, further complicate spectral interpretation (Yurchenko et al., 2025; Madhusudhan, 2018; Marley et al., 2013; Schwieterman & Leung, 2024; Tennyson & Yurchenko, 2012). Recent advances in High-Resolution Spectroscopy (HRS), the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), improved molecular databases, and computational retrieval methods have enhanced atmospheric characterization, yet accurately interpreting the spectra of rocky exoplanets continues to be a major challenge (Snellen, 2025; Madhusudhan et al., 2016; Rukdee, 2024; Schwieterman & Leung, 2024; Tennyson & Yurchenko, 2012; Nixon & Madhusudhan, 2020).

Beyond the choice of spectroscopic technique, accurate atmospheric characterization also depends on the quality of observational data and the models used to interpret them. Spectroscopic observations are compared with theoretical atmospheric models to determine the presence and abundance of different molecules. However, these interpretations depend on assumptions regarding atmospheric temperature profiles, chemical equilibrium, cloud properties, and molecular absorption data (Yurchenko et al., 2025; Marley et al., 2013; Schwieterman & Leung, 2024). Improvements in retrieval frameworks and atmospheric models have allowed researchers to extract more information from limited observations, but uncertainties in these assumptions can still affect the reliability of the final atmospheric interpretation (Marley et al., 2013; Tennyson & Yurchenko, 2012). Therefore, successful characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres requires not only advanced instruments but also accurate modelling approaches that can effectively connect observed spectra with the physical conditions of distant planets.

Challenges in the Spectroscopic Characterization of Rocky Exoplanet Atmospheres

Weak Atmospheric Signals and Atmospheric Retrieval

Weak atmospheric signals remain one of the most significant obstacles to the spectroscopic characterization of rocky exoplanets. Unlike gas giants, rocky exoplanets are smaller and generally possess thinner atmospheres, producing spectral signatures that are often difficult to distinguish from instrumental noise and stellar contamination (Wordsworth & Kreidberg, 2022; Yurchenko et al., 2025; Rukdee, 2024). As a result, many atmospheric molecules generate absorption features that are either too faint to detect confidently or are masked by observational uncertainties. Several studies identify this low signal-to-noise ratio as a major limitation in detecting and characterizing the atmospheres of Earth-sized planets, particularly those located within the habitable zone (Madhusudhan, 2019; Snellen, 2025; Holmberg & Madhusudhan, 2023).

The difficulty of detecting these weak signals arises from multiple interconnected factors. The small planetary radius reduces the amount of atmospheric material available for interaction with stellar radiation, while the limited scale height of rocky planet atmospheres results in smaller variations in the observed spectrum during transit observations (Wordsworth & Kreidberg, 2022; Rukdee, 2024). In addition, stellar activity, instrumental systematics, and background noise can introduce additional variations that may be comparable to the atmospheric signal itself (Yurchenko et al., 2025; Holmberg & Madhusudhan, 2023). These challenges make it difficult to separate genuine planetary features from false or uncertain detections, especially when attempting to identify trace molecules present in small quantities.

The challenge of weak atmospheric signals is closely linked to atmospheric retrieval, which converts observed spectra into estimates of atmospheric composition and physical properties. Retrieval methods rely on comparing observed spectra with theoretical atmospheric models to determine the most likely atmospheric conditions. However, when the available spectral information is limited, multiple atmospheric models can produce similar results, leading to retrieval degeneracies and reduced confidence in the inferred parameters (Yurchenko et al., 2025; Marley et al., 2013). This issue is particularly important for rocky exoplanets, where observations often contain only a limited number of detectable spectral features.

The reliability of atmospheric retrieval is further affected by uncertainties in atmospheric assumptions, including temperature-pressure profiles, chemical abundances, cloud properties, and molecular absorption data (Marley et al., 2013; Schwieterman & Leung, 2024). For example, clouds and hazes can reduce the visibility of molecular absorption features, making an atmosphere appear less chemically active than it actually is (Madhusudhan, 2018; Holmberg & Madhusudhan, 2023). Similarly, incomplete molecular databases may result in incorrect identification or estimation of atmospheric species, limiting the accuracy of retrieved compositions (Schwieterman & Leung, 2024). These uncertainties demonstrate that improved observations alone cannot completely solve the problem; advances in atmospheric modelling and retrieval frameworks are equally necessary.

Recent studies have explored several approaches to overcome these limitations, including improved retrieval algorithms, higher sensitivity spectroscopic instruments, and the integration of advanced computational techniques such as Machine Learning (ML) (Yurchenko et al., 2025; Marley et al., 2013; Tennyson & Yurchenko, 2012; Nixon & Madhusudhan, 2020). High-Resolution Spectroscopy (HRS) has shown promise by providing detailed spectral information that can help separate planetary signals from stellar and instrumental effects (Snellen, 2025; Rukdee, 2024). Meanwhile, improved atmospheric models and data-driven approaches aim to reduce uncertainties during spectral interpretation. However, the literature indicates that no single solution can completely address the challenge. Reliable characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres will require a combined approach involving improved observations, accurate molecular databases, robust retrieval methods, and advanced computational techniques. Based on the reviewed literature, weak atmospheric signals emerge as the fundamental challenge because they directly influence atmospheric retrieval, molecular identification, and the interpretation of atmospheric properties. Consequently, improvements in instrumentation alone are unlikely to fully resolve current limitations without parallel advances in retrieval methods and atmospheric modelling.

Additional Challenges in Atmospheric Characterization

Beyond weak atmospheric signals and atmospheric retrieval uncertainties, several additional challenges continue to restrict the reliable characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres. A major limitation identified across multiple studies is the limited availability of high-quality atmospheric observations for rocky planets. Unlike large gas giants, rocky exoplanets provide smaller atmospheric signatures, making repeated and precise observations necessary to detect and interpret their spectral features (Madhusudhan, 2019; Wordsworth & Kreidberg, 2022; Snellen, 2025; Rukdee, 2024). Although recent facilities such as the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have expanded observational capabilities, obtaining sufficiently detailed spectra of Earth-sized planets remains a significant challenge.

Clouds and hazes represent another important source of uncertainty in atmospheric studies. These atmospheric particles can obscure molecular absorption features, alter observed spectra, and create difficulties in distinguishing between different atmospheric compositions (Madhusudhan et al., 2016; Madhusudhan, 2018; Marley et al., 2013). As a result, similar spectral observations may correspond to significantly different atmospheric conditions, increasing ambiguity during retrieval and limiting confidence in possible detections. This challenge is particularly important when studying potential biosignatures, where incorrect interpretation of atmospheric signals may lead to false conclusions (Madhusudhan, 2019; Wordsworth & Kreidberg, 2022; Schwieterman & Leung, 2024).

Accurate spectral interpretation also depends heavily on the availability of reliable molecular databases. Incomplete molecular line lists or uncertainties in laboratory measurements can affect the identification and abundance estimation of atmospheric species, especially for molecules observed under unfamiliar planetary conditions (Snellen, 2025; Yurchenko et al., 2025; Tennyson & Yurchenko, 2012). Improvements in databases such as ExoMol and continued laboratory spectroscopy are therefore essential for reducing uncertainties in atmospheric modelling.

Finally, observational and instrumental limitations remain important considerations. Calibration errors, stellar variability, telluric contamination in ground-based observations, and detector limitations can introduce additional uncertainties into spectroscopic measurements (Snellen, 2025; Yurchenko et al., 2025; Rukdee, 2024). These effects become especially significant when attempting to detect weak atmospheric signals from rocky planets. Collectively, these challenges demonstrate that the reliability of atmospheric characterization depends on multiple interconnected factors rather than a single observational limitation.

In addition to instrumental limitations, stellar activity introduces another important source of uncertainty during transmission spectroscopy. Stellar spots, faculae, and photospheric heterogeneity can modify the observed stellar spectrum, producing signals that resemble or obscure planetary atmospheric features. This effect, commonly referred to as the Transit Light Source Effect (TLSE), complicates the interpretation of transmission spectra, particularly for small rocky planets orbiting active M-dwarf stars. Recent studies suggest that combining high-resolution spectroscopy with cross-correlation techniques can improve the separation of stellar and planetary spectral signatures, thereby enhancing the reliability of atmospheric characterization.

Recent observations of terrestrial exoplanets further demonstrate the challenges associated with atmospheric characterization. Transmission spectroscopy of planets within the TRAPPIST-1 system has frequently produced nearly flat spectra, making it difficult to distinguish between cloud-dominated atmospheres, atmospheres with limited molecular absorption, and observational uncertainties (de Wit et al., 2018). Similarly, observations of LHS 1140 b have highlighted the challenges of detecting weak atmospheric features around rocky planets, emphasizing the need for improved observational sensitivity and atmospheric retrieval techniques (Damiano et al., 2024). These benchmark systems illustrate the practical impact of weak atmospheric signals on the characterization of potentially habitable exoplanets.

Discussion

The challenges associated with the characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres have motivated the development of improved observational, computational, and modelling approaches. The literature reviewed in this study suggests that overcoming these limitations requires a combined strategy rather than relying on a single technological advancement. Since weak atmospheric signals and retrieval uncertainties represent the primary barriers, future progress depends on improving both the quality of observations and the methods used to interpret them.

One of the most important solutions is the development of more sensitive spectroscopic instruments and advanced observational facilities. High-Resolution Spectroscopy (HRS), together with space-based observatories such as the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), has significantly improved the ability to detect atmospheric signatures from distant planets (Snellen, 2025; Rukdee, 2024). Future extremely large telescopes and next-generation spectrographs are expected to further increase sensitivity, allowing weaker molecular features from smaller rocky planets to be studied. However, improved instruments alone cannot completely solve the problem, as the interpretation of these observations remains limited by atmospheric models and data analysis methods.

Advancements in atmospheric retrieval frameworks represent another major pathway toward improving atmospheric characterization. Traditional retrieval methods can suffer from degeneracies, where multiple atmospheric conditions produce similar spectral signatures. Recent studies have proposed improved retrieval algorithms, more realistic atmospheric models, and statistical approaches that can better account for uncertainties in observations and atmospheric processes (Yurchenko et al., 2025; Marley et al., 2013). Combining observations across multiple wavelengths has also been suggested as an effective method for reducing ambiguity and obtaining more reliable atmospheric constraints.

Improving molecular databases and laboratory spectroscopy is equally important for accurate spectral interpretation. Since atmospheric retrieval depends on comparing observed spectra with theoretical molecular signatures, incomplete or uncertain molecular data can significantly affect the identification of atmospheric species (Schwieterman & Leung, 2024; Tennyson & Yurchenko, 2012). Continued development of comprehensive molecular line databases, along with improved laboratory measurements, will help reduce uncertainties and improve the reliability of future atmospheric studies.

Computational approaches, particularly Machine Learning (ML), have recently emerged as promising tools for analysing complex spectroscopic datasets. Machine learning methods can assist in identifying patterns within large datasets, accelerating retrieval processes, and supporting the analysis of weak signals that may be difficult to interpret using traditional approaches (Nixon & Madhusudhan, 2020). However, these techniques must be carefully validated using physical models and observational data to ensure that they improve scientific interpretation rather than introduce additional uncertainties. Rather than representing independent challenges, the reviewed literature suggests that weak atmospheric signals underpin many of the current limitations in atmospheric characterization by increasing uncertainty throughout the observational and retrieval process.

The reviewed studies consistently suggest that future progress will depend on integrating observational, computational, and theoretical advances rather than relying on individual technological improvements. This integrated strategy offers the greatest potential for overcoming the limitations imposed by weak atmospheric signals and improving the reliable characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres.

Table 1. Summary of the major challenges in the spectroscopic characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres

Challenge	Impact on Atmospheric Characterization	Key Findings from Reviewed Studies	Commonly Proposed Solutions
Weak atmospheric signals	Produce low signal-to-noise ratios, making molecular detection difficult and reducing confidence in spectral interpretation.	Identified as the most significant limitation for rocky exoplanets due to their small size and thin atmospheres.	High-Resolution Spectroscopy (HRS), longer observation times, next-generation telescopes, improved detectors.
Atmospheric retrieval uncertainty	Multiple atmospheric models can fit the same spectrum, leading to ambiguous atmospheric composition and structure.	Retrieval degeneracies are frequently reported in atmospheric retrieval studies.	Improved retrieval algorithms, Bayesian retrieval frameworks, Machine Learning (ML), multi-wavelength observations.
Clouds and hazes	Obscure or flatten spectral features, masking atmospheric molecules and increasing retrieval uncertainty.	Frequently observed as a major source of uncertainty in atmospheric interpretation.	Improved cloud modelling, broader wavelength coverage, combined observational techniques.
Incomplete molecular databases	Missing or inaccurate molecular line data reduce the accuracy of atmospheric models and spectral fitting.	Recent studies demonstrate the importance of comprehensive molecular line databases such as ExoMol.	Expansion of laboratory measurements, continuous database updates, improved molecular spectroscopy.
Instrumental limitations	Detector sensitivity, calibration uncertainties, stellar contamination, and limited observation time reduce observational precision.	Instrument performance remains a limiting factor despite recent technological advances.	Next-generation observatories, improved calibration techniques, higher spectral resolution, advanced noise-reduction methods.

Table 1 summarizes the major challenges identified across the reviewed literature in the spectroscopic characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres. The studies consistently indicate that weak atmospheric signals and atmospheric retrieval uncertainty represent the most critical challenges, while clouds and hazes, incomplete molecular databases, and instrumental limitations further reduce the reliability of atmospheric characterization.

Table 2. Comparison of current and emerging solutions for the spectroscopic characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres

Proposed Solution	Primary Challenge Addressed	Key Advantages	Current Limitations	Future Research Direction
High-Resolution Spectroscopy (HRS)	Weak atmospheric signals; low signal-to-noise ratio	Resolves faint molecular absorption features and improves atmospheric detection.	Limited by telescope aperture, detector sensitivity, and observing time.	Combine HRS with next-generation observatories for improved detection of Earth-sized exoplanets.
Next-Generation Space- and Ground-Based Observatories (JWST, ELTs)	Instrumental limitations; weak atmospheric signals	Higher spectral resolution, broader wavelength coverage, and greater observational sensitivity.	Competition for observing time and remaining instrumental systematics.	Develop future missions dedicated to rocky exoplanet atmospheric characterization.
Advanced Atmospheric Retrieval Algorithms	Retrieval uncertainty	Reduce model degeneracy and improve estimation of atmospheric composition and structure.	Results remain dependent on assumptions and input atmospheric models.	Develop more robust, physics-based retrieval frameworks with uncertainty quantification.
Expanded Molecular Databases (e.g., ExoMol)	Incomplete molecular line lists	Improve molecular identification and increase retrieval accuracy.	Spectroscopic data for several molecules remain incomplete under exoplanet conditions.	Expand laboratory measurements and continuously update molecular databases.
Machine Learning (ML)	Complex spectral analysis; retrieval efficiency	Enables rapid analysis of large spectroscopic datasets and supports atmospheric retrieval.	Performance depends on representative training datasets and model interpretability.	Integrate ML with physically constrained retrieval methods for improved reliability.
Multi-Wavelength and Multi-Technique Observations	Cloud and haze interference; incomplete atmospheric information	Combines complementary observations to better constrain atmospheric properties.	Requires coordination between multiple instruments and observing campaigns.	Increase integrated observations across different wavelength ranges and observational platforms.

Table 2 compares the principal solutions proposed in the reviewed literature to address the challenges associated with the spectroscopic characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres. While significant progress has been achieved through advances in instrumentation, atmospheric retrieval techniques, molecular databases, and computational methods, no single approach completely overcomes the current limitations. The literature consistently suggests that integrating multiple observational, computational, and modelling approaches will be essential for improving the reliable characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres.

Conclusion

The spectroscopic characterization of rocky exoplanet atmospheres represents one of the most challenging yet rapidly developing areas of modern astrophysics. This review highlights that weak atmospheric signals and uncertainties in atmospheric retrieval remain the central challenges limiting reliable atmospheric analysis. The difficulty of detecting faint spectral features is further increased by additional factors, including limited observations of rocky planets, cloud and haze interference, incomplete molecular databases, and instrumental limitations.

Recent developments in spectroscopy, observational facilities, atmospheric modelling, and computational techniques have significantly improved the ability to study distant planetary atmospheres. However, no single approach can completely overcome the challenges associated with rocky exoplanet characterization. Future progress will require a coordinated effort involving higher-sensitivity instruments, improved retrieval frameworks, accurate molecular databases, realistic atmospheric models, and advanced computational methods such as Machine Learning.

As next-generation telescopes and analytical techniques continue to develop, the study of rocky exoplanet atmospheres will move closer toward obtaining reliable measurements of their chemical compositions and physical properties. Although significant challenges remain, the combination of improved observations and advanced interpretation methods provides a promising pathway toward understanding the diversity of planetary environments and identifying potentially habitable worlds beyond the Solar System.

The continued development of observational facilities, atmospheric retrieval methods, molecular databases, and computational approaches is expected to significantly improve the study of rocky exoplanet atmospheres over the coming decade. As these advances become increasingly integrated, spectroscopy will play an even greater role in revealing the diversity, evolution, and potential habitability of rocky worlds beyond the Solar System.

References

Holmberg, M., & Madhusudhan, N. (2023). Exoplanet spectroscopy with JWST NIRISS: Diagnostics and case studies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 524(1), 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1580

Madhusudhan, N. (2025). Atmospheric Retrieval of Exoplanets. In: Deeg, H.J., Belmonte, J.A. (eds) Handbook of Exoplanets . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30648-3_104-2

Madhusudhan, N. (2019). Exoplanetary atmospheres: Key insights, challenges, and prospects. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 57, 617–663. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.03190

Madhusudhan, N., Agúndez, M., Moses, J. I., & Hu, Y. (2016). Exoplanetary atmospheres—Chemistry, formation conditions, and habitability. Space Science Reviews, 205, 285–348. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1604.06092

Marley, M. S., Ackerman, A. S., Cuzzi, J. N., & Kitzmann, D. (2013). Clouds and hazes in exoplanet atmospheres (arXiv:1301.5627). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1301.5627

Nixon, M. C., & Madhusudhan, N. (2020). Assessment of supervised machine learning for atmospheric retrieval of exoplanets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 496(1), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.10755

Rukdee, S. (2024). Instrumentation prospects for rocky exoplanet atmospheres studies with high resolution spectroscopy. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 27356. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.01102

Schwieterman, E. W., & Leung, M. (2024). An overview of exoplanet biosignatures. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 90(1), 465–514. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.15431

Snellen, I. A. G. (2025). Exoplanet atmospheres at high spectral resolution. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 63, 83–125. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.08926

Tennyson, J., & Yurchenko, S. N. (2012). ExoMol: Molecular line lists for exoplanet and other atmospheres. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 425(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1204.0124

Wordsworth, R., & Kreidberg, L. (2022). Atmospheres of rocky exoplanets. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 60, 159–201. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2112.04663

Yurchenko, S. N., Tennyson, J., & Brogi, M. (2025). Data challenges and prospects of high-resolution spectroscopy of exoplanets. Nature Reviews Physics, 7, 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-025-00839-z

About the Author

Kripita Srivastava is a student at Delhi Public School, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India, with a strong interest in astrophysics and its intersection with artificial intelligence. She founded open-astro-lab, a GitHub organization dedicated to building publicly accessible educational resources and interactive tools that make complex astronomical topics approachable for curious general audiences. This review reflects her interest in exoplanet science and in making current research on rocky exoplanet atmospheres more accessible to young researchers and enthusiasts.